China is the epicenter of the IEEPA tariff refund story. No other country was hit with tariffs as high, as broadly applied, or as economically significant as those imposed on Chinese imports under IEEPA authority. At peak, Chinese goods faced cumulative IEEPA tariffs of 145% — on top of existing Section 301 tariffs of up to 25% and base duty rates that vary by product.
Now that the Supreme Court has struck down IEEPA tariffs, importers of Chinese goods are in line for the largest refunds in the entire recovery landscape. But China-origin claims are also the most complex, because Chinese imports were subject to multiple overlapping tariff programs — and not all of them are refundable.
This guide explains exactly which tariffs on Chinese goods are covered by the Supreme Court ruling, which are not, and how to separate the refundable portion from the rest.
The Tariff Stack on Chinese Imports
To understand what’s refundable, you first need to understand the full tariff stack that applied to Chinese imports during the IEEPA period. There were four distinct tariff programs in play:
1. Base Duty Rate (Column 1 General / NTR Rate)
This is the standard Most Favored Nation duty rate that applies to Chinese goods based on their HTS classification. Rates range from 0% to over 20% depending on the product. These rates have been in effect for decades and are NOT affected by the Supreme Court ruling. They remain in effect.
2. Section 301 Tariffs (Trade Act of 1974)
Beginning in 2018, the U.S. imposed tariffs on Chinese goods under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, in response to findings on intellectual property theft and forced technology transfer. These tariffs were imposed in four waves:
| List | Products | Rate | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| List 1 | Industrial machinery, electronics | 25% | Still in effect — NOT refundable |
| List 2 | Chemicals, semiconductors, plastics | 25% | Still in effect — NOT refundable |
| List 3 | Furniture, appliances, building materials | 25% | Still in effect — NOT refundable |
| List 4A | Consumer goods, apparel, footwear | 7.5% | Still in effect — NOT refundable |
| List 4B | Excluded (phones, laptops, etc.) | 0% | Excluded from 301 |
Section 301 tariffs were authorized under a different statute (the Trade Act of 1974, not IEEPA) and were upheld by the courts in separate litigation. They are completely unaffected by the Supreme Court’s IEEPA ruling and remain in full force. Do not include Section 301 tariffs in your refund calculation.
3. IEEPA Fentanyl Tariffs (Executive Order 14195)
On February 1, 2025, President Trump declared a national emergency regarding fentanyl trafficking and imposed tariffs on Chinese imports under IEEPA authority. The rates escalated:
- February 4, 2025: 10% fentanyl tariff on all Chinese goods
- March 4, 2025: Increased to 20% on all Chinese goods
These tariffs applied universally to all Chinese imports regardless of HTS classification. They were imposed under IEEPA authority and are fully refundable under the Supreme Court ruling.
4. IEEPA Reciprocal/“Liberation Day” Tariffs
On April 2, 2025, the administration imposed “reciprocal” tariffs under IEEPA authority on imports from dozens of countries. For China, the rate was initially set at 34%, then escalated:
- April 2, 2025: 34% reciprocal tariff
- April 9, 2025: Escalated to 125% (retaliatory increase)
- April 15, 2025: Peaked at 145%
- May 14, 2025: Reduced to 30% (90-day pause adjustment)
These tariffs were also imposed under IEEPA authority and are fully refundable under the Supreme Court ruling.
How to Calculate Your China IEEPA Refund
The refundable amount for any Chinese import entry is:
IEEPA Refund = Total Duty Paid − Base Duty − Section 301 Duty − Section 232 Duty (if applicable)
Here’s a worked example:
Product: Plastic storage containers (HTS 3924.10) Customs value: $100,000 Entry date: August 15, 2025
| Tariff Layer | Rate | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Base duty (Column 1) | 3.4% | $3,400 |
| Section 301 (List 4A) | 7.5% | $7,500 |
| IEEPA Fentanyl (EO 14195) | 20% | $20,000 |
| IEEPA Reciprocal (post-pause) | 10% | $10,000 |
| Total duty paid | 40.9% | $40,900 |
| IEEPA refundable portion | 30% | $30,000 |
The $30,000 IEEPA portion is refundable. The $10,900 in base duty and Section 301 tariffs is not.
For a detailed methodology applicable to your full portfolio, see the refund calculation guide.
Get your free Impact Assessment →
Why China Claims Are the Most Complex
Several factors make China-origin IEEPA claims more complicated than claims for other countries of origin:
Multiple IEEPA Programs Applied Simultaneously
Chinese goods were subject to both the fentanyl tariff AND the reciprocal tariff. Most other countries were only subject to the reciprocal tariff. This means China entries have two separate IEEPA tariff lines to identify and claim, and the rates changed at different times for each program.
Section 301 Overlap Creates Confusion
Because Section 301 tariffs also applied to Chinese goods, there are three or four separate tariff layers on each entry. Not all entry summary formats cleanly separate these layers. Some brokers recorded a combined duty amount without breaking out the individual tariff programs. If your entry data doesn’t show a clean breakout of IEEPA vs. Section 301 vs. base duty, the entries need individual analysis to determine the refundable amount.
Rate Changes Were Frequent
The IEEPA tariff rate on Chinese goods changed six times between February and May 2025 alone. Entries that cleared customs on different dates during this period were assessed at different rates. A shipment that cleared on April 1 was assessed at 20% IEEPA; a shipment that cleared on April 3 was assessed at 54% IEEPA. The difference on a $500,000 entry is $170,000.
This means that for China claims, the entry date is critical. Even a one-day difference in when goods cleared customs can significantly change the refund amount.
Classification Disputes Are More Common
Chinese imports have been subject to intense CBP scrutiny since the Section 301 tariffs began in 2018. Many importers experienced classification challenges, valuation adjustments, or country-of-origin reviews during this period. Any unresolved classification dispute affects both the Section 301 liability (which stays) and the IEEPA liability (which is refundable). If CBP reclassified an entry during the IEEPA period, the refund calculation must be based on the reclassified HTS code, not the original declaration.
Transshipment and Country-of-Origin Issues
One of the most sensitive issues in China IEEPA recovery is country of origin. When tariffs on Chinese goods reached 145%, the incentive to avoid Chinese origin through transshipment (shipping goods through a third country like Vietnam or Malaysia) was enormous. CBP increased enforcement of country-of-origin rules, and importers who transshipped Chinese goods through other countries face serious legal risk.
If your goods were manufactured in China and you declared a different country of origin, do not file for an IEEPA refund on those entries. Filing for a refund would draw attention to entries that may have false origin declarations, creating criminal exposure far exceeding the refund value.
If your goods were genuinely manufactured in another country (even if components came from China), the country of origin for tariff purposes is where the “substantial transformation” occurred. These entries may or may not have been subject to IEEPA tariffs depending on the declared origin — but they are not China-origin claims.
If your goods were manufactured in China and correctly declared as Chinese origin, your claims are straightforward. The IEEPA tariffs were assessed correctly at the time, and the refund is based on the Supreme Court ruling that the tariffs themselves were unconstitutional.
Product Categories With the Highest China IEEPA Exposure
Almost every product category imported from China was affected, but some categories have disproportionately high exposure:
Electronics and electrical components (HTS 85): China supplies the majority of consumer electronics, components, and accessories. Section 301 List 4B excluded many electronics from 301 tariffs, which means the IEEPA tariff may be the only additional tariff layer — making the refund calculation simpler. See the electronics importers guide.
Toys and games (HTS 95): Over 80% of U.S. toy imports come from China. The lead plaintiff in the Supreme Court case was a toy importer. Section 301 List 4A applied at 7.5%, so the IEEPA refund is the amount above that layer.
Furniture (HTS 94): Chinese furniture imports were hit with Section 301 List 3 at 25% PLUS IEEPA tariffs. The total tariff burden on furniture from China reached over 70% at the post-pause rates.
Apparel and textiles (HTS 61-62): China remains a major source of apparel despite years of tariff-driven sourcing shifts. Section 301 List 4A applied at 7.5%. See the apparel importers guide.
Auto parts (HTS 87): Chinese auto parts were subject to both Section 301 and IEEPA tariffs. This category has relatively clean documentation because automotive supply chains are well-tracked.
Machinery and industrial equipment (HTS 84): High per-entry values make these some of the most valuable individual claims. See the machinery importers guide.
The De Minimis Change and China
Before the IEEPA tariffs, Chinese goods valued under $800 per shipment could enter the U.S. duty-free under the Section 321 de minimis exemption. Executive Order 14195 eliminated this exemption for Chinese goods, effective February 4, 2025.
This change forced millions of small parcels — particularly those shipped by e-commerce sellers — into formal customs entry. Each of those formal entries was assessed IEEPA tariffs. With the Supreme Court ruling, the IEEPA tariffs on those entries are refundable, but the de minimis exemption itself has not been restored (it was eliminated by executive order, not by tariff imposition, so the court ruling doesn’t directly affect it).
If you have formal entries that were filed only because of the de minimis elimination, those entries are refundable to the extent they were assessed IEEPA tariffs. The underlying question of whether the de minimis change was valid under IEEPA is a separate legal issue that may be addressed in future litigation.
The China IEEPA Refund Resource
For China-specific guidance beyond what’s covered here — including rate tables by product category, filing templates, and deadline tracking — chinatariffrefund.com is a dedicated resource for China-origin IEEPA recovery. It covers the unique considerations that apply when China is your primary sourcing country.
The Financial Impact of China IEEPA Recovery
The scale of China IEEPA refunds means the financial impact extends beyond simple cash recovery. For many importers, this refund will be the largest single cash inflow outside of revenue in the company’s history.
Working Capital and Cash Flow
If you’re a mid-size importer doing $30 million annually from China, your IEEPA refund at a blended 30% rate is approximately $9 million. That’s $9 million that was pulled out of your working capital over the course of a year. Getting it back restores liquidity that you may have replaced with borrowing, delayed payments to vendors, or reduced inventory.
For companies that took on debt to cover tariff costs, the refund can be used to pay down that debt — but the timing matters. If CBP takes 12-18 months to process your refund through protests, you’re paying interest on debt that shouldn’t have existed. The cost of waiting is real and quantifiable.
Tax Treatment of the Refund
The IEEPA refund may be taxable income depending on how you treated the tariff payment originally. If you deducted tariff costs as a business expense (either directly or through COGS), the refund generally constitutes taxable income in the year received. If you capitalized the tariff into inventory cost, the treatment depends on whether that inventory has been sold. Consult your tax advisor for your specific situation.
Pricing and Competitive Positioning
Many China importers raised prices during the IEEPA period to offset tariff costs. With tariffs permanently removed (and refunds coming for past payments), you face a strategic decision: lower prices back to pre-tariff levels, maintain current pricing and pocket the margin, or split the difference. The competitive landscape in your industry — and whether competitors are also recovering refunds — should inform this decision.
Common Mistakes in China IEEPA Claims
Claiming Section 301 as IEEPA. This is the number one mistake. Section 301 tariffs look similar to IEEPA tariffs on an entry summary, and some importers file claims for the full duty amount without subtracting the 301 portion. CBP will deny the 301 portion and may delay processing of the entire claim.
Using the wrong IEEPA rate. Because China rates changed six times in four months, applying the wrong rate to an entry produces an incorrect refund amount. Each entry must be matched to the rate in effect on its specific entry date.
Ignoring entries from the peak rate period. April 2-May 13, 2025, was a period when many importers held off on shipments due to the extreme rates. But some entries were filed during this window — and those entries have the highest per-dollar refund potential. Don’t overlook them.
Not filing protective protests on time. The earliest China IEEPA entries are the ones with the most imminent protest deadlines. Waiting for “more clarity” on the refund process while your 180-day windows expire is the most expensive mistake you can make.
Forgetting about small shipments. Air freight samples, quality control shipments, replacement parts, and other small entries from China also carried the IEEPA tariff. They’re individually small but collectively significant.
Your China IEEPA Recovery Action Plan
Step 1: Pull all entry data for Chinese imports between February 4, 2025, and February 24, 2026.
Step 2: For each entry, identify the tariff layers: base duty, Section 301, IEEPA fentanyl, and IEEPA reciprocal. Only the IEEPA layers are refundable.
Step 3: Check liquidation status. File protests within 180 days of liquidation on any entry that has already liquidated. File PSCs on unliquidated entries.
Step 4: For complex claims (multiple HTS codes, classification disputes, high-value entries), get a professional Impact Assessment that maps every entry to its refund amount and recovery path.
Step 5: Evaluate whether high-value claims should be filed through the government process or assigned for immediate capital. The government filing vs. immediate capital analysis provides the decision framework.
China importers have the most to recover. They also have the most complex claims. The difference between recovering everything and leaving money on the table comes down to entry-level analysis.
